New Delhi | Observing that Justice Yashwant Varma's conduct does not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday posed sharp questions to the judge seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row.
The top court asked Justice Varma why did he appear before the in-house inquiry committee and not challenge it then and there.
It told Justice Varma that he should have come earlier to the apex court against the in-house inquiry panel's report.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih said if the Chief Justice of India has material to believe that there is misconduct by a judge then he can inform the president and the prime minister.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Justice Varma, submitted that the in-house inquiry panel's recommendation for his removal is unconstitutional.
Sibal told the court that recommendation of proceedings for removal in this manner would set a dangerous precedent.
The hearing is underway.
You may also like
UP CM Yogi to visit Chitrakoot on Tulsidas Jayanti, attend 'sahitya sammelan'
Maharashtra DyCM Ajit Pawar Orders Immediate Relocation Of Willing Families Near Phule Memorial To Kickstart Expansion Work
"Temporary negotiation tactic": Economics expert Sansanwal on Trump's 25 per cent tariff on India
Maharashtra Politics: Anna Dange Returns To BJP After 23 Years; Fadnavis Slams Congress Over 'Operation Sindoor' Remark
Mumbai Customs Seizes ₹8 Crore Worth Hydroponic Weed, 4 Bangkok Flyers Arrested