Keir Starmer hit by backlash after migrant speech - 'divisive and dangerous'

Keir Starmer has come under fire after claiming uncontrolled immigration risks turning the UK into an “island of strangers".

The PM was accused of using “shameful and dangerous” language, with campaigners warning his words “will only inflame the fire of the far-right”. In a bullish speech in Downing Street Mr Starmer also claimed a reliance on low-paid labour from overseas is “contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart”.

His choice of words sparked a fierce backlash. backbencher Nadia Whittome responded: “The step-up in anti-migrant rhetoric from the government is shameful and dangerous.”

She added that Labour was not elected to “parrot Reform’s scapegoating”, and asked in the Commons why Labour is "apeing Reform". Former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell - who was suspended last year after rebelling over the two-child benefit cap - accused the PM of "reflecting the language" of Enoch Powell's notoriously racist "rivers of blood" speech in the 1960s.

The Independent MP said: "When the Prime Minister referred to ... an island of strangers, reflecting the language of Enoch Powell, does she (Home Secretary Yvette Cooper) realise how shockingly divisive that could be?"

READ MORE:

Ms Cooper responded: "The point that the Prime Minister has repeatedly made is that we need people to be able to integrate, to be able to be part of our communities, to be able to share with our neighbours, and that does mean being able to speak English."

Also hitting out was Labour backbencher Olivia Blake, who warned the PM's words "risk legitimising the same far-right violence we saw in last year's summer riots". And Steve Smith, chief executive of refugee charity Care4Calais said: “This is dangerous language for any prime minister to use. Has Starmer forgotten last year’s far-right riots?

“Shameful language like this will only inflame the fire of the far-right and risks further race riots that endanger survivors of horrors such as war, torture and modern slavery.”

Migration minister Seema Malhotra hit back at suggestions that Mr Starmer's choice of words was anti-migrant. She said: "What that really recognises is that without ways in which we've got common ties that bind us together, the way in which we can communicate well with each other, neighbours can talk to each other, people can play a part and play a role in their communities, that we risk being communities that live side by side, rather than work and walk together."

It came after Mr Starmer unveiled a string of measures including an end to social care visas, moves to prevent “abusive” asylum claims and doubling the standard time people have to live in the UK before being allowed to settle.

Speaking as Labour’s long-awaited immigration strategy was released, the PM vowed: “Now, make no mistake, this plan means migration will fall. That’s a promise.”

But he refused to commit to a specific target. Care industry chiefs have hit out at the decision to scrap social care visas to new applications from abroad.

Last year there were 131,000 vacancies in the sector - a shortage the Government says it will tackle by introducing fair pay agreements to attract UK workers. But Professor Nicola Ranger, general secretary and chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), said yesterday(MON): “The UK is so reliant on overseas workers, especially in social care and the Government has no plan to grow a domestic workforce.

“This is all about politics. Pandering. Scapegoating. This should be about people.” The Government says it will permit visa extensions and allow people with care worker visas to switch jobs until 2028.

It said workers are at highest risk of abuse and exploitation. In a rebuke to “squeamish” Labour MPs, Mr Starmer said: “I actually think that the has as its core values the idea that immigration should be controlled, it should be selective, we should be choosing who we want with high skills, high talent routes into our country.

“And it must be fair, they’re basic Labour arguments and concepts for many, many years.” Speaking at a press conference the Prime Minister accused the Tories of dishonestly overseeing a “one-nation experiment in open borders”.

He claimed this led to a “downward pressure” on wages, telling the nation: “Well, no more. Today, this Labour Government is shutting down the lab. The experiment is over.”

Chancellor watched on as Mr Starmer said the “link doesn’t hold” that higher immigration leads to economic growth. Last year net migration - the number of arrivals minus the total who leave - was 906,000, four times higher than the 224,000 recorded in 2019.

New rules mean migrants applying to come to the UK under skilled workers visas will have to be educated to degree level. And access to the points-based immigration system will be limited to occupations where there has been a long term shortage.

Employers will be required to invest in boosting domestic training - and could be barred from recruiting from overseas if they fail to do so. Universities will be ordered to pay a levy on international students, to be reinvested in skills, with stricter requirements for those who come to the UK to study.

The document said the Government will seek to revoke visas and remove people who commit a “much wider range of crimes”. Government sources said these are likely to include assault, burglaries, sex offences or prolific shoplifting - which would not necessarily result in a prison sentence.

Ministers also vowed to clamp down on people who arrive with a “pre-existing” intention to claim asylum on work and study visas. Language requirements will be tightened for workers and their dependents.

And the requirements for permanent settlement are set to be reformed, the white paper says, increasing the standard qualifying time from five to ten years. People will be able to reduce this time based on “contributions to the UK economy and society”, the strategy states.

Home Secretary Ms Cooper stated: “We are clear that this chaotic system is unsustainable, and so too are the record levels of net migration we have inherited.

“We know that economic migration can help fill skills shortages and bring top international talent. But it should never be an alternative to training and recruiting at home.”

READ MORE: