Next Story
Newszop

NFL's newest metric that's turning heads: Unexpected QB outranks Mahomes, Lamar and even Kelce in Star-Predictor Score (SPS) test rankings

Send Push
In an era where data reigns supreme, the NFL has introduced a groundbreaking metric that’s stirring up plenty of controversy, the Star-Predictor Score test. What started as a tool for fantasy football enthusiasts has quickly grown into a must-know metric for NFL teams, analysts, and fans alike. But as the Star-Predictor Score test continues to gain traction, it’s sparking debates about its accuracy and the real value it brings to evaluating future superstars. Could this be the key to identifying the next big thing, or is it just another overhyped number?


What is the Star-Predictor Score Test?




The Star-Predictor Score test is a data-driven model designed to predict a player's potential success based on a combination of position-specific metrics. Created by Brainy Ballers, a fantasy football platform, the test evaluates incoming NFL talents using a formula that tracks 17 different metrics for running backs and 24 for wide receivers, among other position-specific measures. The result is a percentile score ranging from 0 to 100, which purports to gauge a player’s potential fantasy and NFL success.


This test doesn’t just look at past performance but also attempts to predict future outcomes, making it a valuable tool for both fantasy football enthusiasts and NFL teams looking for the next breakout star.


The rising popularity of the Star-Predictor Score



What’s making the Star-Predictor Score test so popular is its ability to quantify what was once the intangible — potential. As NFL teams continue to lean on analytics to drive decision-making, the Star-Predictor Score test has quickly become a go-to resource for identifying promising prospects. However, it’s not without its flaws.


While the score has successfully highlighted superstars like Patrick Mahomes (96.9) and Lamar Jackson (100.0), it’s also ranked unexpected names at the top. Players like Jaxson Dart (100.0) and Ashton Jeanty (100.0) have found themselves in high-ranking spots. This blend of proven talent and surprise names is what makes the Star-Predictor Score test both intriguing and, at times, controversial.



Is the Star-Predictor Score test reliable?


The question on everyone’s mind is how reliable is the Star-Predictor Score test? While it’s garnered praise for its predictive capabilities, it’s not without its critics. Many argue that the test overvalues raw numbers, ignoring the nuanced elements of football like leadership and chemistry. For instance, Justin Fields and Johnny Manziel received similar scores to Drew Brees (92.4) and Josh Allen (93.6), despite vastly different career trajectories. Travis Kelce , despite being one of the NFL's top tight ends, scored a relatively modest 77.1, highlighting how the test may undervalue players in less “flashy” positions.


This disconnect shows the limitations of relying solely on data-driven models to assess a player’s potential in the NFL.


The future of the Star-Predictor Score test


With the Star-Predictor Score test continuing to evolve, it’s clear that this new metric is here to stay at least for now. Whether it becomes a standard evaluation tool across the NFL or remains a niche tool for fantasy football players and analysts is still up for debate. What’s certain, however, is that the Star-Predictor Score test has introduced a new way of thinking about player potential, and it will likely influence the way NFL teams evaluate talent moving forward.

Also Read: Trey Hendrickson’s contract dispute: Bengals’ lack of communication sparks uncertainty

As the test matures, it’s expected to become more refined, possibly addressing some of its current limitations. But for now, NFL fans, analysts, and teams alike will continue to debate its accuracy and its true value in predicting future success.
Loving Newspoint? Download the app now