Supreme Court has reiterated that proceedings initiated to review a judgment should not be confused with appeal proceedings. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S V N Bhatti cautioned that courts ought not mix up review jurisdiction with appellate jurisdiction . It said that a review petition has a limited purpose and could not be permitted to function as an appeal in disguise .
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
You may also like
Nepal: Gen Z leaders hold talks with President Paudel at Army HQ for interim govt formation
Putin mouthpiece declares 'we will kill you' in chilling WW3 warning to Europe
Once spinners started operating, it changed: UAE coach reflects on match against India
Chelsea could face points deduction after being hit by 74 FA charges
Simple and cheap hack to keep bins from blowing away as first storm of season is forecast